Welcome
to
?Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of
Values?, an inspirational blog taken from the writings of
Paul Volosov, Ph.D.
The pursuit of values: We all know what life is and what liberty
is, but what did our founding fathers mean when they referred to ?the pursuit of
happiness?? Paul believes
that happiness is pursued by living a life based on values. This
blog will share
some of the values Paul has developed over the years and
illustrate the meaning of
each with a short essay or story.
EMPATHY
Sympathy
is about me. Empathy is about the
other person.
Sympathy and
empathy sound alike and refer to
similar human emotions but are polar
opposites in a critical way.
Sympathy is about me while empathy
is about the other person.
When I see or
hear about someone experiencing a
terrible illness or experiencing
some other tragedy, my first
reaction is to feel sympathy for
her: "Poor thing! How awful!" Then I
feel relieved. "Thank the Almighty
it was not me!" In feeling bad for
the other person, I feel good for
myself. The other person's suffering
in a way is a consolation for me. I
have many problems. In comparison to
her problems, however, they are not
that bad!
Over the years
I have heard many people suggest
that it is good to visit the sick or
people with disabilities. In doing
so, I can get a better perspective
about my own problems. This better
perspective may motivate me to get
on with my life despite my problems.
It may even motivate me to try to
solve some of my problems. Sympathy
serves a very positive purpose if
used in this way, but it is still
all about me: my feelings, my
problems, and my motivation to solve
them. All my sympathetic feelings
about the tragedy being experienced
by the other person lead back to me.
Sympathy is all about me!
Empathy also
involves feeling bad for the other
person. It also is based on my
understanding that the other
person's problems really are greater
than mine. But instead of this
feeling and understanding focusing
on me, it focuses on the other
person. How would I feel if I were
in the other person's shoes? How
would I want other people to treat
me? What kind of help from others
would make it a little easier for me
to get through this tragedy? Even
though I am asking questions about
myself, I am focusing on the other
person. Ultimately, my empathic
feeling and understanding has one
purpose: helping the other person
through a difficult period. Empathy
is all about the other person!
Which emotion
should I feel when I see or hear
about someone going through a
difficult time? Both. Sympathy and
empathy are both important emotions.
Although they are different, they
are compatible. Sympathy can lead me
to accept the challenges of my life
more easily. Empathy can lead me to
help others get through the
challenges in their lives.
As I have
gotten older, I have come to realize
that sympathy and empathy are not
only compatible, they are
complementary. As I sympathize with
the other person's challenges, I
accept my own more easily. As I
accept my challenges more easily, I
can focus more on helping others get
through their challenges. As I
empathize with the other person's
challenges and help him get through
them, I become a better person.
Becoming a better person is the best
way for me to get through the
challenges in my life.
REGRET
Regret
for having done something wrong is
not the same as feeling guilty about
having done something wrong.
The only
emotional response more
dysfunctional than feeling extremely
guilty is not feeling guilty at all.
A person who does not feel guilty at
all when he does something wrong is
a sociopath. This is a fancy way of
saying that he has not incorporated
social rules into his personality. A
sociopath does what he wants when he
wants and how he wants. Other people
do not matter. To a sociopath,
"rules" are for suckers!
A person who
feels extremely guilty when he does
something wrong is better than a
sociopath. He has incorporated
social rules into his personality.
Still, this person rarely
contributes much to society. Extreme
feelings of guilt paralyze a person.
A person with extreme feelings of
guilt is so distraught over "being
bad,” that he rarely has time to be
good. Instead of making a person
better, extreme feelings of guilt
make a person worse. Perhaps more
accurately, they make a person less.
Feeling
somewhat guilty after having done
something wrong is a good thing (for
the most part). Feelings of guilt
are uncomfortable. To alleviate
these feelings, the person
experiencing them may try to right
the wrong he has done. The desire to
avoid these negative feelings may
also motivate a person to avoid
repeating his "bad" behavior.
Righting our wrongs and avoiding
"bad" behavior are desirable from a
societal standpoint. If moderate
feelings of guilt lead us to right
our wrongs and avoid "bad" behavior
then they too are desirable from a
societal standpoint.
Even if
moderate guilt feelings lead us to
right our wrongs and avoid "bad"
behavior, they are not really
necessary. Both of those positive
goals can be met without feelings of
guilt. The only thing that is really
needed is regret. Regret is not a
feeling. It is a logical conclusion
that one should arrive at after
realizing that what was done was
wrong. When I realize that I did
something that was wrong and I
experience regret, I also become
motivated to right that wrong and
avoid the same behavior in the
future.
Regret, not
feeling guilty, is the real
motivator to right wrongs and avoid
negative behavior. Once this is
understood, one need not feel guilty
at all. One only needs to experience
regret. Am I guilty? That is the
concern of the legal system in civil
matters and the concern of the
Almighty in religious matters. Do I
need to right the wrongs that I have
done? Do I need to avoid
inappropriate behavior in the
future? Both of those questions are
my issues. The answer to both
questions is "Yes!" whether or not I
feel guilty.
CHAMPION
Is a
champion someone who beats others
who are less able? Or is a champion
someone who beats others even though
they are more able? Or is a champion
someone who keeps on trying
regardless of the outcome? Or is a
champion someone who keeps on trying
regardless of the challenge?
When I think of
someone who was a real champion, I
think of Mohammed Ali, one of the
great boxers of all time. During the
period that he was the
heavyweight-boxing champion of the
world, he was known as a highly
skilled boxer. But was he the best
boxer? That depends on how you
define "best." Many observers
criticized Ali for his "rope-a-dope"
practice. When his opponent seemed
to be getting the best of him, Ali
leaned against the ropes that
surrounded the boxing ring, held up
his hands to protect his head and
body and took a real beating. When
his opponent wore himself out
without inflicting any serious
damage, Ali got off the ropes and
finished his opponent off. Did
winning in this way make him the
superior boxer? If we answer this
question simply based on who was
left standing at the end of the
fight, the answer is "yes!" If we
look at other factors, we might
arrive at a different answer. Other
boxers may have been stronger,
faster, and may have had better
technique. Yet, he won many
championship fights. In a very real
sense, Ali beat others who may
actually have been better boxers
than he was, at least in some
important ways.
How did Ali
beat other boxers, even superior
boxers? His rope-a-dope technique, a
strategy that he invented and used
to maximum advantage, certainly
contributed to Ali's success. So did
his big mouth. Successful boxers are
not particularly modest, but Ali
made self-aggrandizement into an art
form that may never be duplicated.
As fast as he was with his feet, he
was even faster with his mouth. Ali
may have beaten other boxers with
superior skills because he "psyched
them out" in a way that no one has
been able to duplicate.
After he
retired from the ring, Ali continued
to be a sought-after personality.
People loved to see and hear him,
and he became a successful "draw"
for many causes and events. As the
years progressed, Ali began to
display significant physical
limitations that his doctors
attributed to the repeated head
injuries he had sustained in the
ring. As he deteriorated further, he
became extremely limited physically
and was barely able to speak.
Everyone expected him to retire.
What else could he do? Who wanted to
see a seriously damaged former
champion who could barely speak?
Everyone! Even when he was "reduced"
to making unintelligible sounds and
using boxing gestures that were
barely recognizable, people wanted
to see and hear him. He was not a
former champion! He was THE CHAMP!
Ali's will to
live and to contribute in any way
made him into a bigger champion in
his latter years than he had been
when he beat all other heavyweight
boxers in the ring. Ali showed us
that a real champion keeps on trying
no matter what the challenge is, and
no matter how small of an
accomplishment meeting that
challenge may seem to others. Ali
was a champion, not because he beat
others, but because he beat himself.
He did more than anyone expected of
him. He may even have done more than
he expected of himself.
CAMELS
A camel
cannot see his own hump, but he sees
every other camel's hump.
It is so easy
to see everyone else's deficiencies.
After all, they have so many. But
me, I have no deficiencies. I am
perfect. Just ask my mother!
On second
thought, do not ask my mother. She
will be very happy to tell you all
about my many deficiencies. But ask
her about her deficiencies, and she
won't know what you are talking
about. After all, she is perfect.
Just ask her mother!
If you ask most
people, they will tell you that they
are much better than most people. I
have never understood this. How can
most people be much better than most
people. Maybe it has something to do
with the "new math." I guess I am
just too old.
Ask some people
about their deficiencies, and they
either become flustered or really
can't think of any. I make a related
request when I interview people for
jobs. "Tell me three things about
yourself that you would like to
improve professionally," I prod.
Many people just cannot think of any
way they could improve
professionally. As a last resort,
many will give some variation on the
following answer: I could learn more
about ?x? (with ?x? being some topic
that no doubt they really think they
completely understand already).
People think that is a safe answer
since everyone needs to learn
something. But if everyone needs to
learn something, saying: "I need to
improve professionally by learning
something," means nothing.
If you ask
people in a business environment
about how others can improve, they
also are very reluctant to answer.
No one wants to sound like a "stool
pigeon" and talk about their
colleagues' deficiencies. But when
people are on break, some seem to
have unlimited bad things to say
about others. Those others might
even include me. Hard to believe!
Why can't a
camel see its own hump? Because of
where it is located in relation to
where his eyes can turn. The same is
true about you and me and everyone
else. Our faults, as obvious and
glaring as they are to others, are
located in places where we cannot
see them. This is not because we
have a physical anatomy similar to a
camel's physical anatomy. It is
because we choose to hide our faults
psychologically, not only from
others, but also from ourselves. We
do this with all sorts of "defense
mechanisms." We are so afraid of
knowing our faults that we cannot
acknowledge that we have any.
But is having
faults really so bad? Some of them
might be, but most people's faults
are relatively minor or innocuous.
To the extent that they interfere
with accomplishing our goals and our
relations with others, they
interfere with our being the best
that we can be. Being less than the
best that we can be is not so bad.
In fact, only the Almighty is really
the best that He can be. All humans
fall short.
Accepting that I am less than
perfect (OK, much less than perfect) is necessary to start any
self-improvement process. The more I can accept my human failings, the
more I can accept that I can be a better person. Self-improvement starts
with self-awareness. Self-awareness involves knowing my strengths. It also
involves knowing my deficiencies. The biggest paradox of the human
condition may be that not knowing one's deficiencies may be the greatest
deficiency of all.
|
CAROUSEL
If going around in circles was a valued activity, we would all be
rich.
Every amusement park seems to have a carousel that the
little kids are thrilled to ride. All the carousel does is go around in
circles. If you are lucky enough to get one of the better "horses," you also
go up and down as you go around in circles. Regardless, the carousel does
not take you anywhere.
We older folks do not particularly enjoy the carousel.
Sure, we will ride along with our kids or grandkids, but that is only
because they enjoy it. I doubt that any adult would choose to ride a
carousel if the kids did not want to.
Even older kids do not like to ride the carousel. You
could not catch one going on a carousel alone. If you are lucky, they might
do you a big favor and ride along with their younger sibling to make sure he
does not get hurt.
Why don't older children and adults like to ride the
carousel? I am sure there are many reasons. Maybe the most important one is
that we already spend too much time going around in circles.
Most of what we do does not take us anywhere. In fact,
going around in circles may actually be an improvement at times because so
often we are just running in place or spinning our wheels.
How can we get out of the rut that we seem to be stuck
in? Many people turn to a variety of highly undesirable activities to liven
up their lives: alcohol, drugs, gambling, pornography, etc. These and
similar activities may be very exciting, at least at first. I may be fooling
myself since I have never been one to indulge in these activities, but they
do not seem to fit the bill. Within a short period of time, these activities
become another way to ride the carousel. They stop being so exciting. Unless
you are willing to gamble ever-larger sums of money, take larger doses of
drugs, or look at increasingly perverted pornography on the Internet, you
will adapt and these activities will lose their thrill.
I am sure that I do not have the entire answer, but
accomplishing something valuable by giving to others must be part of the
solution. Becoming part of something bigger than yourself like a religious
or charitable group may also be important.
Another factor may be to enjoy the company of family
and friends more. A well-known song suggests, "If you can't be with the one
you love, love the one you're with!" Perhaps it may be more appropriate, if
less poetic, to say, "Two people riding the carousel together may not get
any further that someone riding alone, but they are a lot less lonely."
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
It is impossible to anticipate all the relevant
consequences of our decisions.
Recently, I was watching the news about Hurricane
Gustav as it approached the New Orleans coast. Among the many human-interest
issues presented, the topic of saving peoples? pets came up. During
Hurricane Katrina, the government refused to provide evacuation services for
pets. The logic was simple: We have hundreds of thousands of people to save.
We just do not have time or resources to save pets.
Was this a logical decision for the government to make?
My guess is that everyone, except for extreme pet lovers, agreed with this
decision at the time. Yet, the government had reversed its policy and was
now offering free emergency evacuation services for pets. What made the
government change its decision?
During Hurricane Katrina, many people had decided to
stay put and not evacuate without their pets. They loved their pets too much
to leave them to a fate that seemed to mean sure death in the absence of
their owners. Many of these people became trapped in collapsed or flooded
buildings and had to be saved. Saving these people was more expensive than
the projected cost of evacuating their pets. Worse still, the first
responders were put in many dangerous situations while rescuing these
individuals. Evacuating peoples' pets and thereby getting more people to
evacuate would actually save money, the government planners decided. More
important, it would mean less people at risk of being trapped and less risk
for the first responders who would be called on to save them.
This story is a classic example of the law of
unintended consequences. Decisions that seem to make sense based on what is
known frequently turn out to be much less than sensible when the unintended
consequences inevitably become known.
How can we prepare for unintended consequences? We
cannot. Unintended consequences are by definition unknown when the decision
is made. In some cases they are not only unknown, but also unknowable. No
one can foresee every possible consequence to every decision that is made.
While we cannot prepare for unintended consequences, we
can carefully watch for them all the time. Early identification of these
unintended consequences enables us to adjust our decisions at the earliest
possible time to minimize their negative impacts.
SCARCITY
Nothing is innately valuable. All value
comes from scarcity.
As a youngster, I struggled to
understand what makes something
valuable. Is there something special
about gold that makes it so valuable, I
wondered? Actually, there are many
things about gold that are special. Gold
is the most "malleable" of all metals.
This means that a skilled goldsmith can
create a large sheet of gold leaf from a
small quantity of gold. Even though gold
is so expensive per ounce, it is
relatively inexpensive per square foot
because it can be made so thin. Gold
leaf is so inexpensive that it is used
to cover the domes of mosques and other
important buildings. Is this the quality
that makes gold so expensive? No. This
quality is one of the many
characteristics that makes gold so
useful. What makes it expensive is the
fact that there is just not enough of it
to go around. Gold is scarce. Scarcity
is the common denominator among all
valuable items. If gold were lying
around in everyone's backyard, it would
be cheap despite its great usefulness.
This rule applies to all valuables,
not just commodities like gold. Skills
are also valuable because they are
scarce. Doctors do not make a lot more
money than most other professionals in
the United States because healing the
sick is such an admirable profession.
They make more money than other
professionals do because there are not
enough doctors in the United States.
Doctors in Israel, in contrast, make
about the same salary as bus drivers.
This is due to the dramatic oversupply
of doctors in Israel. As the supply of
doctors in the United States has
increased, their relatively high
compensation has begun to decrease as
well.
Many years ago as I searched for a
job after being awarded my doctoral
degree in psychology, I learned quickly
that psychologists are not particularly
scarce. Nor are they highly compensated
compared to other professionals. What
could I do to make my professional
activities more valuable, I wondered.
As I have explained in greater detail
in the early chapters of my book, "A
Beautiful Business," I decided to
specialize in supporting people who have
severe mental retardation and behavioral
complications. There were not that many
people who fit that description, but the
number of psychologists who were expert
in their care in the mid- to late-1970s
when I started my career was even less.
By specializing in an area that almost
no one else was interested in, I made
myself a scarce and valuable
professional.
This approach has become a primary
principle that makes our organization
special. We provide many services to
many different types of people. The
common denominator among all of our
activities is that we serve people with
the most serious and complex disorders.
Most of our competitors serve people
with more common -
less scarce -
disorders. This commitment and our
exceptional success in fulfilling it are
very scarce. That is the primary reason
we are such a valuable organization.
CREDIT
Easy money is expensive money.
When I was growing up in Brooklyn,
there were many small local stores that
were patronized almost exclusively by
people who lived in the neighborhood.
When I walked into any of the several
stores that my mother shopped at, the
owner always greeted me by my first
name. I always responded respectfully
and called him Mister followed by his
last name.
I never had any money when I stopped
at any of these stores. The owner always
was willing to let me take several
items. All I had to say was, "My mom
will pay you later." You might think
that my mother was a wealthy woman who
had a large credit account with the
store. She wasn't, and she didn't. We
actually were very poor. I never took
anything expensive. Nor did I ever take
anything that I did not need. Most
important, my mother always paid ?
eventually.
Getting credit in any of these stores
was not that easy. Credit was based on
personal relationships that were built
over years. It took my mother a long
time until all the local storeowners
knew her and her children. Once she got
this credit, however, it came with very
easy terms. She did not need to pay
interest, and there was no deadline to
pay. As long as she paid somewhat
regularly, her credit remained good.
When times were bad like when she was
between jobs, the store owners even "let
her slide" until she could get back on
her feet.
When I got a little older, a
supermarket opened in the neighborhood.
I did not know the owner of the
supermarket. He certainly did not greet
me by name when I entered the store. I
doubt that the owner even worked there.
If he did, he must have been in some
office away from the shoppers because we
never met him. We never did get credit
at the supermarket. Worse still, the
lower prices charged by the supermarket
eventually put all of the local stores
out of business. Within a few years,
there was no place for my family to buy
on credit. When we did not have money,
we did without.
When I became an adult and got a job,
I became credit worthy in my own right.
This credit, however, was totally
different than the credit my mother had
received when I was a child. It was not
based on any relationship. Instead, it
was based on some formula calculated by
an impersonal corporation that tracked
credit worthiness of people they knew
only "on paper" and eventually only "in
the computer." This credit was not
particularly hard to get, provided that
you really did not need it. It did
include very high interest payments. It
also had steep penalties if you missed a
payment or simply forgot to pay by the
monthly deadline.
I do not miss being poor, but I do
miss the trust that made the
relationship between local shopkeepers
and local families possible. Those days
are long gone, and I suppose they will
never return. Life is almost certainly
much easier now, but it seems like it
was so much simpler back then.
BASICS
The success of our
organization is based on superior
attention to the basics, not on
superior esoteric knowledge or
secret techniques that we have
developed.
I was talking about our
organization, my favorite topic of
discussion, to a very sophisticated
individual not long ago. After
describing the variety of services
we provide to the different
populations we support, he surprised
me by saying, "You know, you are all
over the place!" He meant that
unlike other organizations that
focus on one or at most several
activities for a given population,
we do many things for many types of
people.
I have thought a lot about his
comment. Overall, he is correct. We
are not focused on one type of
service. Nor are we focused on one
population of people. That does not
mean we are "out of focus." In fact,
I believe we are very focused
-
on the intersection between serious
and complex challenges. I have
always sought out the greatest
challenges I can find. Meeting those
challenges in an excellent manner
has been the standard I have set for
our organization. We do not always
succeed, but we almost never fail
completely. I say "almost" because
over the past 30 years, there have
been a few individuals whose
challenges have proven to be more
than we could handle. Clearly, we
can be excellent in many ways for
many people, but we cannot be
everything for everyone with serious
and complex challenges.
How do we succeed with excellence so
often in meeting these serious and
complex challenges that other
organizations cannot or will not
meet? Do we have superior knowledge
of the most current and
sophisticated techniques in our
respective professions? I know that
many of the professionals we employ
are among the most knowledgeable and
skillful in their fields. These
professionals certainly contribute
to our success. But many other
organizations employ quality
professionals. Yet, they are not
committed the way we are, nor do
they accomplish what we accomplish.
Have we developed secret techniques
that no one else knows about? If we
do, they must be so secret that even
I do not know about them.
What is the "secret" to our success
in meeting so many serious and
complex challenges? There is no
secret, just a strong and ever
present commitment to the basics.
Our shorthand for this commitment is
summed up in just a few words:
"First, we do the right thing!"
Because our first and primary
commitment is to "do the right
thing," we are able to accomplish
near miracles for many people with
the most serious and complex
challenges.
We do have other commitments, of
course. We must meet regulatory and
contractual requirements. We must
maintain our financial health. We
must communicate with many other
organizations, individuals, and the
community at large. All of these and
other commitments are very important
to us, but they are secondary.
"First, we do the right thing ..."
REVENGE
Enjoying life is the best
revenge.
I was talking
with an older woman who was a
survivor of the infamous Auschwitz
concentration camp during World War
II. As is typical with older people,
we started to talk about family,
particularly the pleasures of
grandchildren. At one point, she
turned to me with a smile on her
mouth and a tear in her eye and
said, "For me, grandchildren are not
only a great pleasure. They are the
best revenge!"
At first, I was
taken aback. Here was this sweet,
frail old lady who was a grandmother
and great-grandmother many times
over. Talking about the pleasures of
grandchildren seemed to come so
naturally to her. But what did she
mean when she equated her beautiful
babies with revenge?
As a young
girl, she and her family had hidden
from the Nazis in a small town in
Romania. Unlike most other Eastern
European Jews, her family was still
alive and well in 1943, four years
into the war. One August day, in the
early hours of the morning, they
were awakened by loud, harsh banging
on the door of their modest
farmhouse. Had someone betrayed them
to the Nazis? They did not know.
They soon found themselves in a
packed cattle car without food or
water for three blistering hot days.
After what seemed like an eternity,
they arrived at Auschwitz and were
lined up for the infamous
"selection" process that would
determine who would be sent to the
gas chambers immediately and who
would become slave laborers until
their strength ran out.
When her father
was sent in one direction and her
mother and younger siblings in the
other, she and her older sister did
not know what to do. In a
split-second decision, they decided
to join their mother. As they
struggled to catch up with their
mother and siblings in the confusion
that was an integral part of the
"selection," a Jewish "capo" grabbed
them and screamed at them in a
language that they did not
understand. Finally, he screamed in
Yiddish, "You have time to die!" and
he dragged them screaming and
kicking to the other line where
their father had previously
disappeared in the confusion.
She and her
sister were the only members of
their family to survive to the end
of the war. After a year and
one-half of living hell, the
American Army liberated them in
April 1945. The two of them combined
weighed less than 145 pounds, but
somehow they regained their strength
and made their way to Israel where
they joined a kibbutz, married,
raised families, and lived in
side-by-side cottages for the past
60-plus years. Nothing had separated
them in the war. Nothing has
separated them since. Death may
separate them soon, but only
temporarily.
How much
psychological angst did she
experience as she worked hard to
recreate a normal life after the
war? More than I can imagine. Did
she think about revenge for the
unspeakable horrors that she and her
family had experienced? No doubt. As
the years passed, she gained the
wisdom that some are privileged to
acquire with age. She realized that
inflicting pain on others, even
others who may be very deserving of
that treatment, could not undo the
horrors of the past. If there is
revenge, it is only in enjoying
life, and what greater life
enjoyment can there be than watching
one's grandchildren grow and develop
as good human beings.
Subscribing and Unsubscribing: Please email our newsletter to
anyone and everyone
who you think may benefit from it. It is free! To subscribe or
unsubscribe to the newsletter,
please click on the appropriate selection below. If subscribing, please take a moment to add pvolosov@thepursuitofvalues.com to your
address book or safe sender list to ensure that our newsletter emails continue to be delivered to your inbox.
Subscribe to
Newsletter | Unsubscribe to Newsletter